lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091124152245.GB21821@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:22:45 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	fweisbec@...il.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, efault@....de,
	tglx@...utronix.de, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:tracing/core] ring-buffer benchmark: Run producer/consumer
 threads at nice +19


* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 15:39 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > > This module is not made to be run all the time. I know you do it 
> > > for testing. But running it at lowest priority kills the reason 
> > > this module was made in the first place!
> > 
> > Well, it also found quite a few bugs in the ring-buffer code, beyond 
> > benchmarking so i'd like to use it even without looking at the 
> > numbers.
> 
> OK, then lets make a module option (and command line) that will allow 
> the setting of the priority of the threads. Either nice or even fifo 
> (use at your own risk ;-)

Yeah, that's fine to me - as long as the default is unintrusive. (i.e. 
like the rcutorture threads, which run at nice +19 too - and kmemcheck 
which runs at +19 as well.)

We still have the perl overhead in function-tracing kernel builds btw
:-/

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ