linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] Defer skb allocation for both mergeable buffers and big packets in virtio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091124160439.GC6737@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:04:39 +0200
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Defer skb allocation for both mergeable buffers
	and big packets in virtio_net

On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 08:36:32AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 08:54:23AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>   
>>> On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:37:01 am Shirley Ma wrote:
>>>     
>>>>>> +             skb = (struct sk_buff *)buf;
>>>>>>           
>>>>> This cast is unnecessary, but a comment would be nice:
>>>>>         
>>>> Without this cast there is a compile warning.       
>>> Hi Shirley,
>>>
>>>    Looks like buf is a void *, so no cast should be necessary.  But I could
>>> be reading the patch wrong.
>>>
>>>     
>>>>> However, I question whether making it 16 byte is the right thing: the
>>>>> ethernet header is 14 bytes long, so don't we want 8 bytes of padding?
>>>>>         
>>>> Because in QEMU it requires 10 bytes header in a separately, so one page
>>>> is used to share between virtio_net_hdr header which is 10 bytes head
>>>> and rest of data. So I put 6 bytes offset here between two buffers. I
>>>> didn't look at the reason why a seperate buf is used for virtio_net_hdr
>>>> in QEMU.
>>>>       
>>> It's a qemu bug.  It insists the header be an element in the scatterlist by
>>> itself.  Unfortunately we have to accommodate it.
>>>     
>>
>> We do?  Let's just fix this?
>>   
>
> So does lguest.

It does? All I see it doing is writev/readv,
and this passes things to tap which handles
this correctly.


>  It's been that way since the beginning.  Fixing this  
> would result in breaking older guests.

If you look at my patch, it handles old guests just fine :).

> We really need to introduce a feature bit if we want to change this.

I am not sure I agree: we can't add feature bits
for all bugs, can we?

-- 
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/