linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: fix gart iommu using for amd 64 bit system

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:28:55 -0800
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>, hpa@...or.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix gart iommu using for amd 64 bit system

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> 
>>> don't think user will like to use SWIOTLB instead of swiotlb.
>> I doubt that users care about a way to fix their problems.
> 
> As far as swiotlb vs. GART goes, arguably a non-bouncing hw based 
> solution (GART) is superior to a bouncing one (swiotlb), right?
> 

yes, should use GART if possible.

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/