[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091124.105442.06273019.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:54:42 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, peterz@...radead.org,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, yong.zhang0@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arjan@...ux.jf.intel.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irq: Add node_affinity CPU masks for smarter
irqbalance hints
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:26:15 +0100
> It seems complex to me, maybe optimal thing would be to use a NUMA policy to
> spread vmalloc() allocations to all nodes to get a good bandwidth...
vmalloc() and sk_buff's don't currently mix and I really don't see us
every allowing them to :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists