[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B0C2D11.80008@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:59:29 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] x86/apic: limit irq affinity
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 10:27 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
>> we already have dev numa node, so could just make irqblance to some smart to use
>> that device node corresponding for irq that is binding to the device.
>
> The argument is that a single device can have multiple IRQs and
> therefore numa nodes.
one node could have 8 cores or 16 threads, so should be right.
other case the intel new 4 sockets system will have two IOHs, and one for socket0 and socket 1
and one for socket2 and socet3
acpi root bus _PXM only can return one.
so wonder if ACPI spec need to be extended to support two nodes there.
after that, we need to extend numa_node to support that.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists