[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091124200135.GA5761@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:01:35 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Ananth Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, utrace-devel@...hat.com
Subject: [RFC,PATCH 02/14] signals: check ->group_stop_count after
tracehook_get_signal()
(already in mm: signals-check-group_stop_count-after-tracehook_get_signal.patch)
Move the call to do_signal_stop() down, after tracehook call.
This makes ->group_stop_count condition visible to tracers before
do_signal_stop() will participate in this group-stop.
Currently the patch has no effect, tracehook_get_signal() always
returns 0.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
---
kernel/signal.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- V1/kernel/signal.c~2_DO_SIGNAL_STOP_AFTER_TRACEHOOK 2009-11-24 19:46:51.000000000 +0100
+++ V1/kernel/signal.c 2009-11-24 19:51:13.000000000 +0100
@@ -1807,11 +1807,6 @@ relock:
for (;;) {
struct k_sigaction *ka;
-
- if (unlikely(signal->group_stop_count > 0) &&
- do_signal_stop(0))
- goto relock;
-
/*
* Tracing can induce an artifical signal and choose sigaction.
* The return value in @signr determines the default action,
@@ -1823,6 +1818,10 @@ relock:
if (unlikely(signr != 0))
ka = return_ka;
else {
+ if (unlikely(signal->group_stop_count > 0) &&
+ do_signal_stop(0))
+ goto relock;
+
signr = dequeue_signal(current, ¤t->blocked,
info);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists