[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0911242252190.24119@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:56:29 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc: peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arjan@...ux.jf.intel.com, mingo@...e.hu, yong.zhang0@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] irq: Add node_affinity CPU masks for smarter irqbalance
hints
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, David Miller wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:07:35 +0100 (CET)
>
> > And what does the kernel do with this information and why are we not
> > using the existing device/numa_node information ?
>
> It's a different problem space Thomas.
>
> If the device lives on NUMA node X, we still end up wanting to
> allocate memory resources (RX ring buffers) on other NUMA nodes on a
> per-queue basis.
>
> Otherwise a network card's forwarding performance is limited by the
> memory bandwidth of a single NUMA node, and on a multiqueue cards we
> therefore fare much better by allocating each device RX queue's memory
> resources on a different NUMA node.
>
> It is this NUMA usage that PJ is trying to export somehow to userspace
> so that irqbalanced and friends can choose the IRQ cpu masks more
> intelligently.
So you need a preferred irq mask information on a per IRQ basis and
that mask is not restricted to the CPUs of a single NUMA node, right ?
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists