[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091124233518.GJ8290@sortiz.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:35:19 +0100
From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Fertser <fercerpav@...il.com>,
Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: mfd tree build failure
Hi Dmitry
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:32:11AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Could we split the above fix so that we get back to the:
> >
> > struct platform_device *rtc_pdev;
> > struct platform_device *mbc_pdev;
> > struct platform_device *adc_pdev;
> > struct platform_device *input_pdev;
> > struct platform_device *regulator_pdev[PCF50633_NUM_REGULATORS];
> >
> > structure ? We can move to the index based structure after the next merge
> > window. That would make my life easier in terms of tree dependencies.
> > If you dont have time to do this change, I'll do it some time this week.
> >
>
> Please feel free to drop or reschedule the patch as you see fit. I don't
> have any problem if it will go in later.
Yes, I'll requeue your patchset after the next merge window is closed.
Thanks for your understanding.
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists