[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9929d2390911242352l4ff1359dt9a9ecba381df3432@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:52:24 -0800
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current
tree
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 19:11, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the net tree got a conflict in
> drivers/net/e1000e/ich8lan.c between commit
> 818f33313caab9be2a10458500dbed4a88c1b334 ("e1000e: do not initiate
> autonegotiation during OEM configuration") from the net-current tree and
> commit 94d8186a693284344ee5cb9734086c7a2370241a ("e1000e: cleanup ops
> function pointers") from the net tree.
>
> Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix for
> a while.
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
>
I am checking your merge changes to e1000e now, sorry for the delayed response.
--
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists