linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ext3 tree with the cifs tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20091125200444.cab8f918.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:04:44 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Steve French <sfrench@...ibm.com>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ext3 tree with the cifs tree

Hi Jan,

On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:50:06 +0100 Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> On Wed 25-11-09 14:06:26, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Today's linux-next merge of the ext3 tree got a conflict in fs/cifs/dir.c
> > between commit cea62343956c24452700c06cf028b72414c58a74 ("[CIFS]
> > Duplicate data on appending to some Samba servers") from the cifs tree
> > and commit 618903228b94b67a1d04634a83ea9cdb99c09e37 ("vfs: Implement
> > proper O_SYNC semantics") from the ext3 tree.
>   Thanks for notification and fixup.
> 
> > Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
> > necessary.
>   Looking at the code, I don't see an easy way of resolving this by changing
> either mine or CIFS tree - I have other patches depending on this and this
> patch depending on others and I assume it's similar with CIFS... So I guess
> we'll have to live with this conflict.

Its not a big issue and even if it hits Linus' tree that way, I think he
would not mind.

I have just noticed that I get the same conflict between the cifs tree
and the fsnotify tree (hi Eric!) which has also included that patch from
Christoph.  Again, not a big problem.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped