linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2 3/3] Define critical regulators as always

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:36:39 +0200
From:	Juha Keski-Saari <ext-juha.1.keski-saari@...ia.com>
To:	ext Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	"lrg@...mlogic.co.uk" <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
	"dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net" <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"De-Schrijver Peter (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" 
	<Peter.De-Schrijver@...ia.com>,
	"Valentin Eduardo (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" <eduardo.valentin@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 3/3] Define critical regulators as always_on

On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 12:13 +0100, ext Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:29:59PM +0200, Juha Keski-Saari wrote:
> 
> > +		case TWL4030_REG_VINTDIG:
> > +			c->always_on = true;
> > +			break;
> 
> One other thing I noticed having seen the MFD series - is this going to
> build without the separate MFD patch you've posted?

Yes, the changes to twl4030-regulator.c compile without the changes the
MFD patch set makes to twl4030-core.c and twl4030.h

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/