linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -tip v5 07/10] kprobes/x86: Support kprobes jump optimization on x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4B0D5789.3000303@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:12:57 -0500
From:	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
To:	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
CC:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	systemtap <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>,
	DLE <dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Anders Kaseorg <andersk@...lice.com>,
	Tim Abbott <tabbott@...lice.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v5 07/10] kprobes/x86: Support kprobes jump	optimization
 on x86

Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Jason Baron wrote:
>> Also, with multiple users we don't want to trample over each others code
>> patching. Thus, if each sub-system could register some type of
>> 'is_reserved()' callback, and then we can call all these call backs from
>> the '__multibyte_poke()' routine before we do any patching to make sure
>> that we aren't trampling on each others code. After a successful
>> patching, each sub-system can update its reserved set of code as
>> appropriate. I can code a prototype here, if this makes sense.
>
> Hmm, we have to implement it carefully, because here kprobes already
> inserted int3 and optprobe rewrites the int3 again. If is_reserved()
> returns 1 and multibyte_poke returns error, we can't optimize it anymore.

IMHO, all text-modifiers except kprobes provide is_reserved() callback
and kprobes cancels probing if its target address is reserved, since
only kprobes changes texts anywhere while others changes texts at
fixed addresses.

Anyway, I think this will be another bugfix for current kprobes/alternative.

Thank you,
-- 
Masami Hiramatsu

Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America), Inc.
Software Solutions Division

e-mail: mhiramat@...hat.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/