linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/86] pata_atiixp: no need to program PIO timings for MWDMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091125172558.69b37360@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:25:58 +0000
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/86] pata_atiixp: no need to program PIO timings for
 MWDMA

On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:03:23 +0100
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com> wrote:

> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] pata_atiixp: no need to program PIO timings for MWDMA
> 
> Moreover the code to do it was buggy and programmed PIO timings
> even if they were already set to a desired values.
> 
> There shouldn't be any problems with it as IDE atiixp host driver
> has been allowing separate PIO/MWDMA timings for last two years.

I need to take a look at the history of this - it got put there for a
reason I am sure. Whether a right one I don't know. Needs running past
AMD/ATI's maintainer anyway who should know.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/