linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 86/86] libata: add private driver field to struct ata

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200911251902.45049.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:02:44 +0100
From:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 86/86] libata: add private driver field to struct ata_device

On Wednesday 25 November 2009 06:56:50 pm Alan Cox wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:12:48 +0100
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] libata: add private driver field to struct ata_device
> > 
> > This brings struct ata_device in-line with struct ata_{port,host}.
> 
> Do we need it for anything yet - whoever first needs it can add it,
> otherwise its just waste.

There is a new driver using it (to be posted later) and it makes libata API
more coherent for driver developers..

--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/