[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B0D9221.2050103@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:22:57 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mm-commits@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <Jens.Axboe@...cle.com>, neilb@...e.de
Subject: Re: BUG at scsi_lib.c:1108 [Was: mmotm 2009-11-24-16-47 uploaded]
On 11/25/2009 04:19 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 16:12 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> On 11/25/2009 01:47 AM, akpm@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
>>> The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2009-11-24-16-47 has been uploaded to
>>
>> Hi, I'm hitting the BUG below in the past two -mmotm's
>> (2009-11-24-16-47, 2009-11-17-14-03):
>
> So this looks like some type of bug in the barrier code. What the BUG_ON
> is saying is that something sent us a REQ_TYPE_FS (which should be a
> filesystem read or write) with no attached data, so we can't process it.
>
> I've cc'd Jens to see what he thinks.
>
> Could you bisect this to find the offending commit?
Hmm. I bisected it twice to
commit 1bebedd653e1bb0440ebf40724c55791c21ad7cc
Merge: a8d5ddf 62fa36a
Author: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed Nov 25 17:42:47 2009 +1100
Merge remote branch 'md/for-next'
It doesn't make sense at all. How can empty merge cause a regression?
And md/for-next doesn't produce the BUG.
After the 1st bisection I did
git checkout 1bebedd653e1bb0440ebf40724c55791c21ad7cc
and built it. It crashed. Then I did
git bisect start 1bebedd origin/stable
where origin is next. And got back to the 1bebedd by bisection.
--
js
Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University
Suse Labs, Novell
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists