[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200911251045.02736.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:45:02 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Defer skb allocation for both mergeable buffers and big packets in virtio_net
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:06:32 am Anthony Liguori wrote:
> So does lguest. It's been that way since the beginning. Fixing this
> would result in breaking older guests.
Agreed, we can't "fix" it in the guests, but it's a wart. That's why I
haven't bothered fixing it, but if someone else wants to I'll cheer all the
way.
lguest did it because I knew I could fix lguest any time; it was a bad mistake
and I will now fix lguest :)
> We really need to introduce a feature bit if we want to change this.
I don't think it's worth it. But the spec does say that the implementation
should not rely on the framing (I think there's a note that current
implementations are buggy tho, so you should frame it separately anyway).
That way future devices can get it right, at least.
Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists