[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091125215018.GB4916@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:50:18 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Ananth Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>, Ingo@...stfloor.org,
"Molnar <mingo"@firstfloor.org, utrace-devel@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH 14/14] utrace core
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 09:32:27PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> writes:
>
> > From: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
> >
> > This adds the utrace facility, a new modular interface in the kernel
> > for implementing user thread tracing and debugging. This fits on top
> > of the tracehook_* layer, so the new code is well-isolated.
>
> Could we just drop the tracehook layer if this finally merged
> and call the low level functions directly?
>
> It might have been reasonably early on when it was still out of tree,
> but longer term when it's integrated having strange opaque hooks
> like that just makes the coder harder to read and maintain.
I agree that linux/tracehook.h as a separate layer is pretty annoying,
but a lot of the helper actually are quite useful. I'd suggest to throw
a patch ontop of the series to rename all the useful macros to utrace_
and move them into utrace.h and just remove those that are really
trivial wrappers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists