[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B0CCE4A.5000602@analog.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:27:22 +0800
From: Jie Zhang <jie.zhang@...log.com>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
CC: uClinux development list <uclinux-dev@...inux.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
David McCullough <davidm@...pgear.com>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] [PATCH] NOMMU: use copy_*_user_page() in access_process_vm()
On 11/25/2009 02:16 PM, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> From: Jie Zhang<jie.zhang@...log.com>
>>
>> The mmu code uses the copy_*_user_page() variants in access_process_vm()
>> rather than copy_*_user() as the former includes an icache flush. This is
>> important when doing things like setting software breakpoints with gdb.
>> So switch the nommu code over to do the same.
>
> Reasonable, but it's a bit subtle don't you think?
> How about a one-line comment saying why it's using copy_*_user_page()?
>
> (If it was called copy_*_user_flush_icache() I wouldn't say anything,
> but it isn't).
>
But I think it's well known in Linux kernel developers that
copy_to_user_page and copy_from_user_page should do cache flushing. It's
documented in Documentation/cachetlb.txt. I don't think it's necessary
to replicate it here.
Jie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists