linux-kernel - RE: [Bug 14658] Regression in efi.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <EADF0A36011179459010BDF5142A457501D006B76C@pdsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:40:17 +0800
From:	"Tang, Feng" <feng.tang@...el.com>
To:	indexer <indexer@...ernode.on.net>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Bug 14658] Regression in efi.c

William,

You've confirmed that apply commit 772be899b "x86: Make EFI RTC function depend
on 32bit again" right after 7bd867dfb "x86: Move get/set_wallclock to 
x86_platform_ops" will get a bootable kernel.

Then, one debug method may be use "git-rebase -i" to move commit 772be899b right after 
7bd867dfb, and do the bisect from there on. 

Thanks,
Feng
>-----Original Message-----
>From: indexer [mailto:indexer@...ernode.on.net]
>Sent: 2009年11月25日 17:43
>To: Tang, Feng
>Cc: LKML
>Subject: Re: [Bug 14658] Regression in efi.c
>
>Feng tang
>
>I have just tested and applied that correction, and it resulted in a
>working system. I dont really know where to go from here so any advice
>would be appreciated.
>
>William