linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/17] [LogFS] New flash filesystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091126083614.GI10944@logfs.org>
Date:	Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:36:15 +0100
From:	Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/17] [LogFS] New flash filesystem

On Thu, 26 November 2009 10:51:03 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:55:11 +0100 Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org> wrote:
> > 
> > do you have a reason not to add logfs to linux-next?
> 
> Apart from not having been asked to do so, no ;-)
> 
> i.e. send me a request with the git url and I will add it.

Being of sound state of mind, I hereby request that you add
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/joern/logfs.git
to linux-next.

Something like that?  Or would you doubt my state of mind if I willing
accept the risk of breaking others' compile and suffering the angry
emails that inevitably follow?

Jörn

-- 
A quarrel is quickly settled when deserted by one party; there is
no battle unless there be two.
-- Seneca
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/