lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:50:52 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] tracing: Convert some block events to DEFINE_EVENT


* Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 26 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, Nov 26 2009, Li Zefan wrote:
> > > > use TRACE_EVENT_TEMPLATE to remove duplicate code:
> > > > 
> > > >    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
> > > >   53570    3284     184   57038    dece block/blk-core.o.old
> > > >   43702    3284     144   47130    b81a block/blk-core.o
> > > 
> > > Nice! When I played with the writeback tracing, I did notice that code
> > > bloat does get pretty severe quickly.
> > > 
> > > I have applied this to for-2.6.33, thanks a lot.
> > 
> > Note that it wont build in your tree, because the TRACE_EVENT_TEMPLATE / 
> > DEFINE_EVENT facility this relies on is not upstream yet.
> > 
> > The events are not affected in any way (and block/* is not modified) - 
> > it's just a more efficient representation of the same. I've applied them 
> > to -tip, to keep the facility and dependent updates in a single place.
> 
> OK, lets merge them through -tip then. You can add my acked-by.

Thanks Jens!

Do you have any pending (or planned) changes to 
include/trace/events/block.h in the block tree that might cause 
problems?

We can pick those up too (and resolve any conflicts) to reduce the 
surface of friction.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ