[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091126090353.GR8742@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:03:53 +0100
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com>
Cc: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] cfq-iosched: policy fixes
On Tue, Nov 24 2009, Corrado Zoccolo wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> I've collected some bugfixes to the for-2.6.33 branch.
> Excluding the NCQ policy fix, that I'm resending with improved changelog,
> the bugs were found by Vivek while investingating performance drops
> or unfairness while testing cgroups. Nevertheless, those fixes have
> general impact, so they should go in before cgroup code is merged:
> * no-idle preemption logic was both under/over preempting.
> it should preempt only if the active queue is idling due to
> no-idle service tree empty
> * seeky queues with large depth could steal too much bandwidth to
> low depth ones, so they will be marked as idling, and have exclusive
> access to disk for their time share
> * the idling logic had some corner cases in which idling was not enabled,
> even if it should have been, caused by rq_noidle and rq_in_driver checks.
> Those were adjusted to better match the original intention.
Thanks Corrado, applied all 4!
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists