[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1259231144.4273.27.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:25:44 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Spencer Candland <spencer@...ehost.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>,
Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 1/3] introduce task_times() to replace
task_{u,s}time() pair
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 14:48 +0900, Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
> Functions task_{u,s}time() are called in pair in almost all
> cases. However task_stime() is implemented to call task_utime()
> from its inside, so such paired calls run task_utime() twice.
>
> It means we do heavy divisions (div_u64 + do_div) twice to get
> utime and stime which can be obtained at same time by one set
> of divisions.
>
> This patch introduces a function task_times(*tsk, *utime, *stime)
> to retrieve utime and stime at once in better, optimized way.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
OK, the patch looks good, but it does not solve those non monotonic
times funnies that started all this, right?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists