[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1259235525.9212.444.camel@calx>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:38:45 -0600
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To: Ian Molton <ian.molton@...labora.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
jeff@...zik.org
Subject: Re:
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 10:49 +0000, Ian Molton wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> This version uses a statically allocated buffer. I dont feel it is a
> good idea not to pass the address and length of the buffer to the hardware
> drivers, as they shouldnt have intimate knowledge of the core, IMO.
I agree, but let me quote myself:
---
> + if (!data_avail) {
> + bytes_read = rng_get_data(current_rng, rng_buffer,
> + RNG_BUFFSIZE, !(filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK));
No need to pass rng_buffer to the helper as there's only one with global
scope.
---
--
http://selenic.com : development and support for Mercurial and Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists