[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091126130153.GA3697@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:01:53 -0500
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jean Tourrilhes <jt@....hp.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the wireless-current tree
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:33:09AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 14:10 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the net tree got a conflict in
> > net/wireless/wext.c between commit
> > 9fed059667d35fca9288460106e92dbb8ba35ea1 ("WE: Fix set events not
> > propagated") from the tree and commit
> > 3d23e349d807177eaf519d444677cee86b1a04cf ("wext: refactor") from the net
> > tree.
> >
> > The latter deleted the file that the former modified. I just ignored the
> > wireless-current change and removed the file (which seems to have been
> > done in the latter change anyway).
>
> The fix should probably have gone to wext-core.c instead?
Yes. That's the way I did it in the merge-test branch of wireless-next-2.6.
Thanks,
John
--
John W. Linville
linville@...driver.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists