[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1259241733.3062.44.camel@palomino.walls.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:22:13 -0500
From: Andy Walls <awalls@...ix.net>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>, Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mario Limonciello <superm1@...ntu.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
Janne Grunau <j@...nau.net>,
Christoph Bartelmus <lirc@...telmus.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Should we create a raw input interface for IR's ? - Was:
Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] lirc core device driver infrastructure
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 10:36 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> > Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com> writes:
> PS.: For those following those discussions that want to know more about
> IR protocols, a good reference is at:
> http://www.sbprojects.com/knowledge/ir/ir.htm
>
> Unfortunately, it doesn't describe RC6 mode 6.
RC-6 Mode 0 and Mode 6A is briefly describe here:
http://www.picbasic.nl/frameload_uk.htm?http://www.picbasic.nl/rc5-rc6_transceiver_uk.htm
That page is slightly wrong, as there is some data coded in the header
such as the RC-6 Mode.
This page is an older version of the sbprojects.com RC-6 page, before
the information on RC-6 Mode 6A was removed:
http://slycontrol.ru/scr/kb/rc6.htm
My personal opinion is that, for non-technical reasons, RC-6 Mode 6A
decoding should not be included in the kernel. That's why I didn't do
it for the HVR-1850/CX23888.
Regards,
Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists