[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1r5rlz1eq.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:38:53 -0800
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Anna Fischer <anna.fischer@...com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Smith <lk-netdev@...netdev.nosense.org>,
Gerhard Stenzel <gerhard.stenzel@...ibm.com>,
Jens Osterkamp <jens@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Patrick Mullaney <pmullaney@...ell.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] veth: move loopback logic to common location
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net> writes:
> Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Tuesday 24 November 2009, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>>> I don't quite follow what you intend with dev_queue_xmit when the macvlan
>>>> is in one namespace and the real physical device is in another. Are
>>>> you mentioning that the packet classifier runs in the namespace where
>>>> the primary device lives with packets from a different namespace?
>>> Exactly. And I think we should make sure that the namespace of
>>> the macvlan device can't (deliberately or accidentally) cause
>>> misclassification.
>>
>> This is independent of my series and a preexisting problem, right?
>
> Correct.
>
>> Which fields do you think need to be reset to maintain namespace
>> isolation for the outbound path in macvlan?
>
> In addition to those already handled, I'd say
>
> - priority: affects qdisc classification, may refer to classes of the
> old namespace
> - ipvs_property: might cause packets to incorrectly skip netfilter hooks
> - nf_trace: might trigger packet tracing
> - nf_bridge: contains references to network devices in the old NS,
> also indicates packet was bridged
> - iif: index is only valid in the originating namespace
> - tc_index: classification result, should only be set in the namespace
> of the classifier
> - tc_verd: RTTL etc. should begin at zero again
> - probably secmark.
Wow. I thought we were trying to reduce skbuff, where did all of those
fields come from? Regarless that sounds like a good list to get stomped.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists