[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091126164212.GA24421@sig21.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:42:12 +0100
From: Johannes Stezenbach <js@...21.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: Mikhail Malygin <mmalygin@....de>, Hans Werner <hwerner4@....de>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Samsung N130 ATA exception after 5min uptime -- Phoenix FailSafe
issue?
Hi,
I'm refering to
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14314
and I still have this issue on a N130 with latest BIOS (05CM),
running kernel 2.6.32-rc8 + wireless-testing.
BIOS Information
Vendor: Phoenix Technologies Ltd.
Version: 05CM.M011.20091013.JIP
Release Date: 10/13/2009
Address: 0xE6300
Runtime Size: 105728 bytes
ROM Size: 2048 kB
Characteristics:
ISA is supported
PCI is supported
PNP is supported
BIOS is upgradeable
BIOS shadowing is allowed
ESCD support is available
ACPI is supported
USB legacy is supported
Smart battery is supported
BIOS boot specification is supported
Targeted content distribution is supported
BIOS Revision: 5.0
Around 5min after boot or resume if generates the following error:
[ 302.364174] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
[ 302.364201] ata1.00: failed command: WRITE DMA
[ 302.364234] ata1.00: cmd ca/00:08:f7:01:1a/00:00:00:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 4096 out
[ 302.364241] res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x4 (timeout)
[ 302.364257] ata1.00: status: { DRDY }
[ 307.408107] ata1: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
[ 312.392109] ata1: device not ready (errno=-16), forcing hardreset
[ 312.392138] ata1: soft resetting link
[ 312.574482] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
[ 312.574506] ata1.00: device reported invalid CHS sector 0
[ 312.574542] ata1: EH complete
This also happens when booting with rdinit=/bin/sh, i.e. only running busybox sh
inside initrd. The error then appears when accessing the disk after the 5min
period with dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null count=10000.
The link in comment #14 is dead but eventually I found
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Moblin:/Base/openSUSE_11.1/src/kernel-source-2.6.31.6-37.1.src.rpm
which contains the attached patch with a samsung_laptop driver.
I think it is weird that the Samsung BIOS has a special "SECLINUX" mode,
but anyway the samsung_laptop driver works (the backlight control via ACPI
also works with the 05CM BIOS, though).
However, it does not prevent the ATA exception.
(Side note about backlight level 0: I noticed that in Windows when you
set the backlight to the lowest level, after a minute of inactivity
the screen would dim one level more. Stupid -- why not allow the user
to choose that level manually?)
So I guess one really needs the special Linux BIOS that Greg was talking
about in comments #14 and #16? It is not clear from comment #17
which BIOS worked for Mikhail.
Or did I just miss some patch or magic config setting?
According to $subject, I have a wild theory that the issue
might be caused by the Phoenix "FailSafe" BIOS feature.
first of all, there is no indication on Samsung's web pages
anywhere that the N130 has it, but I had looked at the pre-installed
Windows before I wiped it (and did the BIOS update while at it),
and it had a "Phoenix FailSafe" icon prominently placed on the desktop.
Some searching yields:
http://www.failsafe.com/samsung-partner-profile
And after some more searching:
http://www.blackhat.com/presentations/bh-usa-09/ORTEGA/BHUSA09-Ortega-DeactivateRootkit-PAPER.pdf
which is about Computrace which appears to be a similar technology.
What I think is what happens is that the BIOS waits to be contacted
by the Windows "FailSafe" agent, and if that doesn't happen then the BIOS
tries to reinstall the agent into the Windows installation. Thus it
accesses the disk behind the OS's back, and this causes the ATA exception.
When FailSafe isn't activated by the user then the BIOS shouldn't do that,
but the BIOS developers might have thought different...
Note however that the BIOS setup screen contains no indication about FailSafe
support, so this is all wild guessing. It would fit in with the "special
Linux BIOS" info, though. But I had hoped that the "SECLINUX" mode
would also disable it.
Thanks
Johannes
View attachment "samsung-laptop-driver.patch" of type "text/plain" (17207 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists