[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091126164414.GK29096@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:44:14 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Amerigo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Roger Quadros <quadros.roger@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] kfifo: add record handling functions
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 05:07:12PM +0100, Stefani Seibold wrote:
> I analyzed the code and most of them will be optimized away by the
> compiler. The reason for this design decision was that i want no
> performance regression against the old kfifo implementation.
>
> But if the majority vote for an non inline version i will do it. It will
> make the code more readable and slim down the footprint.
I vote for smaller text size if possible. I doubt kfifo is used in any
circumstances where a function call or two is a big problem. But of course
some inlines might be smaller than calls.
But then this code has been pending for a long time and I
have some potential users. It would be good to merge ASAP and do such tweaks
later in tree.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists