[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091126223153.GA7177@nowhere>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:31:56 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trace_syscalls: add missed field
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 03:49:33PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>
> Field syscall number is missed in syscall_enter_define_fields()/
> syscall_exit_define_fields().
>
> syscall number is also needed for event filter or other users.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Well, I don't think it's very useful for in-kernel filtering.
Filtering a syscall event by its number would mean filtering all
event for this syscall. This is the same as not tracing it.
Or do you have other usecases in mind?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists