[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B0F1F42.50509@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:37:22 +0900
From: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Spencer Candland <spencer@...ehost.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>,
Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 1/3] introduce task_times() to replace task_{u,s}time()
pair
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 14:48 +0900, Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
>> This patch introduces a function task_times(*tsk, *utime, *stime)
>> to retrieve utime and stime at once in better, optimized way.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
>
> OK, the patch looks good, but it does not solve those non monotonic
> times funnies that started all this, right?
Yes, you are right.
These three patches are cleanup, not bugfix.
I don't have any clear idea to solve the original issue yet...
Thanks,
H.Seto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists