| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20091127114450.GK13095@csn.ul.ie>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:44:50 +0000
From: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To: Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Sven Geggus <lists@...hsschwanzdomain.de>,
Karol Lewandowski <karol.k.lewandowski@...il.com>,
Tobias Oetiker <tobi@...iker.ch>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@...net.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH-RFC] cfq: Disable low_latency by default for 2.6.32
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 04:18:18PM +0100, Corrado Zoccolo wrote:
> > <SNIP>
> >
> > In case you mean a partial disabling of cfq_latency, I'm try the
> > following patch. The intention is to disable the low_latency logic if
> > kswapd is at work and presumably needs clean pages. Alternative
> > suggestions welcome.
As it turned out, that patch sucked so I aborted the test and I need to
think about it a lot more.
> Yes, I meant exactly to disable that part, and doing it when kswapd is
> active is probably a good choice.
> I have a different idea for 2.6.33, though.
> If you have a reliable reproducer of the issue, can you test it on
> git://git.kernel.dk/linux-2.6-block.git branch for-2.6.33?
> It may already be unaffected, since we had various performance
> improvements there, but I think a better way to boost writeback is
> possible.
>
I haven't tested the high-order allocation scenario yet but the results
as thing stands are below. There are four kernels being compared
1. with-low-latency is 2.6.32-rc8 vanilla
2. with-low-latency-block-2.6.33 is with the for-2.6.33 from linux-block applied
3. with-low-latency-async-rampup is with "[RFC,PATCH] cfq-iosched: improve async queue ramp up formula"
4. without-low-latency is with low_latency disabled
SYSBENCH
sysbench-with low-latency low-latency sysbench-without
low-latency block-2.6.33 async-rampup low-latency
1 1266.02 ( 0.00%) 824.08 (-53.63%) 1265.15 (-0.07%) 1278.55 ( 0.98%)
2 1182.58 ( 0.00%) 1226.42 ( 3.57%) 1223.03 ( 3.31%) 1379.25 (14.26%)
3 1218.64 ( 0.00%) 1271.38 ( 4.15%) 1246.42 ( 2.23%) 1580.08 (22.87%)
4 1212.11 ( 0.00%) 1257.84 ( 3.64%) 1325.17 ( 8.53%) 1534.17 (20.99%)
5 1046.77 ( 0.00%) 981.71 (-6.63%) 1008.44 (-3.80%) 1552.48 (32.57%)
6 1187.14 ( 0.00%) 1132.89 (-4.79%) 1147.18 (-3.48%) 1661.19 (28.54%)
7 1179.37 ( 0.00%) 1183.61 ( 0.36%) 1202.49 ( 1.92%) 790.26 (-49.24%)
8 1164.62 ( 0.00%) 1143.54 (-1.84%) 1184.56 ( 1.68%) 854.10 (-36.36%)
9 1095.22 ( 0.00%) 1178.72 ( 7.08%) 1002.42 (-9.26%) 1655.04 (33.83%)
10 1147.52 ( 0.00%) 1153.46 ( 0.52%) 1151.73 ( 0.37%) 1653.89 (30.62%)
11 823.38 ( 0.00%) 820.64 (-0.33%) 754.15 (-9.18%) 1627.45 (49.41%)
12 813.73 ( 0.00%) 791.44 (-2.82%) 848.32 ( 4.08%) 1494.63 (45.56%)
13 898.22 ( 0.00%) 789.63 (-13.75%) 931.47 ( 3.57%) 1521.64 (40.97%)
14 873.50 ( 0.00%) 938.90 ( 6.97%) 875.75 ( 0.26%) 1311.09 (33.38%)
15 808.32 ( 0.00%) 979.88 (17.51%) 877.87 ( 7.92%) 1009.70 (19.94%)
16 758.17 ( 0.00%) 1096.81 (30.87%) 881.23 (13.96%) 725.17 (-4.55%)
sysbench is helped by both both block-2.6.33 and async-rampup to some
extent. For many of the results, plain old disabling low_latency still
helps the most.
desktop-net-gitk
gitk-with low-latency low-latency gitk-without
low-latency block-2.6.33 async-rampup low-latency
min 954.46 ( 0.00%) 570.06 (40.27%) 796.22 (16.58%) 640.65 (32.88%)
mean 964.79 ( 0.00%) 573.96 (40.51%) 798.01 (17.29%) 655.57 (32.05%)
stddev 10.01 ( 0.00%) 2.65 (73.55%) 1.91 (80.95%) 13.33 (-33.18%)
max 981.23 ( 0.00%) 577.21 (41.17%) 800.91 (18.38%) 675.65 (31.14%)
The changes for block in 2.6.33 make a massive difference here, notably
beating the disabling of low_latency.
IOZone
iozone-with low-latency low-latency iozone-without
low-latency block-2.6.33 async-rampup low-latency
write-64 151212 ( 0.00%) 163359 ( 7.44%) 163359 ( 7.44%) 159856 ( 5.41%)
write-128 189357 ( 0.00%) 184922 (-2.40%) 202805 ( 6.63%) 206233 ( 8.18%)
write-256 219883 ( 0.00%) 211232 (-4.10%) 189867 (-15.81%) 223174 ( 1.47%)
write-512 224932 ( 0.00%) 222601 (-1.05%) 204459 (-10.01%) 220227 (-2.14%)
write-1024 227738 ( 0.00%) 226728 (-0.45%) 216009 (-5.43%) 226155 (-0.70%)
write-2048 227564 ( 0.00%) 224167 (-1.52%) 229387 ( 0.79%) 224848 (-1.21%)
write-4096 208556 ( 0.00%) 227707 ( 8.41%) 216908 ( 3.85%) 223430 ( 6.66%)
write-8192 219484 ( 0.00%) 222365 ( 1.30%) 217737 (-0.80%) 219389 (-0.04%)
write-16384 206670 ( 0.00%) 209355 ( 1.28%) 204146 (-1.24%) 206295 (-0.18%)
write-32768 203023 ( 0.00%) 205097 ( 1.01%) 199766 (-1.63%) 201852 (-0.58%)
write-65536 162134 ( 0.00%) 196670 (17.56%) 189975 (14.66%) 189173 (14.29%)
write-131072 68534 ( 0.00%) 69145 ( 0.88%) 64519 (-6.22%) 67417 (-1.66%)
write-262144 32936 ( 0.00%) 28587 (-15.21%) 31470 (-4.66%) 27750 (-18.69%)
write-524288 24044 ( 0.00%) 23560 (-2.05%) 23116 (-4.01%) 23759 (-1.20%)
rewrite-64 755681 ( 0.00%) 800767 ( 5.63%) 469931 (-60.81%) 755681 ( 0.00%)
rewrite-128 581518 ( 0.00%) 639723 ( 9.10%) 591774 ( 1.73%) 799840 (27.30%)
rewrite-256 639427 ( 0.00%) 710511 (10.00%) 666414 ( 4.05%) 659861 ( 3.10%)
rewrite-512 669577 ( 0.00%) 743788 ( 9.98%) 692017 ( 3.24%) 684954 ( 2.24%)
rewrite-1024 680960 ( 0.00%) 755195 ( 9.83%) 701422 ( 2.92%) 686182 ( 0.76%)
rewrite-2048 685263 ( 0.00%) 743123 ( 7.79%) 703445 ( 2.58%) 692780 ( 1.09%)
rewrite-4096 631352 ( 0.00%) 686776 ( 8.07%) 640007 ( 1.35%) 643266 ( 1.85%)
rewrite-8192 442146 ( 0.00%) 474089 ( 6.74%) 457768 ( 3.41%) 442624 ( 0.11%)
rewrite-16384 428641 ( 0.00%) 454857 ( 5.76%) 442896 ( 3.22%) 432613 ( 0.92%)
rewrite-32768 425361 ( 0.00%) 444206 ( 4.24%) 434472 ( 2.10%) 430568 ( 1.21%)
rewrite-65536 405183 ( 0.00%) 433898 ( 6.62%) 419843 ( 3.49%) 389242 (-4.10%)
rewrite-131072 66110 ( 0.00%) 58370 (-13.26%) 54342 (-21.66%) 58472 (-13.06%)
rewrite-262144 29254 ( 0.00%) 24665 (-18.61%) 25710 (-13.78%) 29306 ( 0.18%)
rewrite-524288 23812 ( 0.00%) 20742 (-14.80%) 22490 (-5.88%) 24543 ( 2.98%)
read-64 934589 ( 0.00%) 1160938 (19.50%) 1004538 ( 6.96%) 840903 (-11.14%)
read-128 1601534 ( 0.00%) 1869179 (14.32%) 1681806 ( 4.77%) 1280633 (-25.06%)
read-256 1255511 ( 0.00%) 1526887 (17.77%) 1304314 ( 3.74%) 1310683 ( 4.21%)
read-512 1291158 ( 0.00%) 1377278 ( 6.25%) 1336145 ( 3.37%) 1319723 ( 2.16%)
read-1024 1319408 ( 0.00%) 1306564 (-0.98%) 1368162 ( 3.56%) 1347557 ( 2.09%)
read-2048 1316016 ( 0.00%) 1394645 ( 5.64%) 1339827 ( 1.78%) 1347393 ( 2.33%)
read-4096 1253710 ( 0.00%) 1307525 ( 4.12%) 1247519 (-0.50%) 1251882 (-0.15%)
read-8192 995149 ( 0.00%) 1033337 ( 3.70%) 1016944 ( 2.14%) 1011794 ( 1.65%)
read-16384 883156 ( 0.00%) 905213 ( 2.44%) 905213 ( 2.44%) 897458 ( 1.59%)
read-32768 844368 ( 0.00%) 855213 ( 1.27%) 849609 ( 0.62%) 856364 ( 1.40%)
read-65536 816099 ( 0.00%) 839262 ( 2.76%) 835019 ( 2.27%) 826473 ( 1.26%)
read-131072 818055 ( 0.00%) 837369 ( 2.31%) 828230 ( 1.23%) 824351 ( 0.76%)
read-262144 827225 ( 0.00%) 839635 ( 1.48%) 840538 ( 1.58%) 835693 ( 1.01%)
read-524288 24653 ( 0.00%) 21387 (-15.27%) 20602 (-19.66%) 22519 (-9.48%)
reread-64 2329708 ( 0.00%) 2251544 (-3.47%) 1985134 (-17.36%) 1985134 (-17.36%)
reread-128 1446222 ( 0.00%) 1979446 (26.94%) 2009076 (28.02%) 2137031 (32.33%)
reread-256 1828508 ( 0.00%) 2006158 ( 8.86%) 1892980 ( 3.41%) 1879725 ( 2.72%)
reread-512 1521718 ( 0.00%) 1642783 ( 7.37%) 1508887 (-0.85%) 1579934 ( 3.68%)
reread-1024 1347557 ( 0.00%) 1422540 ( 5.27%) 1384034 ( 2.64%) 1375171 ( 2.01%)
reread-2048 1340664 ( 0.00%) 1413929 ( 5.18%) 1372364 ( 2.31%) 1350783 ( 0.75%)
reread-4096 1259592 ( 0.00%) 1324868 ( 4.93%) 1273788 ( 1.11%) 1284839 ( 1.96%)
reread-8192 1007285 ( 0.00%) 1033710 ( 2.56%) 1027159 ( 1.93%) 1011317 ( 0.40%)
reread-16384 891404 ( 0.00%) 910828 ( 2.13%) 916562 ( 2.74%) 905022 ( 1.50%)
reread-32768 850492 ( 0.00%) 859341 ( 1.03%) 856385 ( 0.69%) 862772 ( 1.42%)
reread-65536 836565 ( 0.00%) 852664 ( 1.89%) 852315 ( 1.85%) 847020 ( 1.23%)
reread-131072 844516 ( 0.00%) 862590 ( 2.10%) 854067 ( 1.12%) 853155 ( 1.01%)
reread-262144 851524 ( 0.00%) 860559 ( 1.05%) 864921 ( 1.55%) 860653 ( 1.06%)
reread-524288 24927 ( 0.00%) 21300 (-17.03%) 19748 (-26.23%) 22487 (-10.85%)
randread-64 1605256 ( 0.00%) 1605256 ( 0.00%) 1605256 ( 0.00%) 1775099 ( 9.57%)
randread-128 1179358 ( 0.00%) 1582649 (25.48%) 1511363 (21.97%) 1528576 (22.85%)
randread-256 1421755 ( 0.00%) 1599680 (11.12%) 1460430 ( 2.65%) 1310683 (-8.47%)
randread-512 1306873 ( 0.00%) 1278855 (-2.19%) 1243315 (-5.11%) 1281909 (-1.95%)
randread-1024 1201314 ( 0.00%) 1254656 ( 4.25%) 1190657 (-0.90%) 1231629 ( 2.46%)
randread-2048 1179413 ( 0.00%) 1227971 ( 3.95%) 1185272 ( 0.49%) 1190529 ( 0.93%)
randread-4096 1107005 ( 0.00%) 1160862 ( 4.64%) 1110727 ( 0.34%) 1116792 ( 0.88%)
randread-8192 894337 ( 0.00%) 924264 ( 3.24%) 912676 ( 2.01%) 899487 ( 0.57%)
randread-16384 783760 ( 0.00%) 800299 ( 2.07%) 793351 ( 1.21%) 791341 ( 0.96%)
randread-32768 740498 ( 0.00%) 743720 ( 0.43%) 741233 ( 0.10%) 743511 ( 0.41%)
randread-65536 721640 ( 0.00%) 727692 ( 0.83%) 726984 ( 0.74%) 728139 ( 0.89%)
randread-131072 715284 ( 0.00%) 722094 ( 0.94%) 717746 ( 0.34%) 720825 ( 0.77%)
randread-262144 709855 ( 0.00%) 706770 (-0.44%) 709133 (-0.10%) 714943 ( 0.71%)
randread-524288 394 ( 0.00%) 421 ( 6.41%) 418 ( 5.74%) 431 ( 8.58%)
randwrite-64 730988 ( 0.00%) 764288 ( 4.36%) 723111 (-1.09%) 730988 ( 0.00%)
randwrite-128 746459 ( 0.00%) 799840 ( 6.67%) 746459 ( 0.00%) 742331 (-0.56%)
randwrite-256 695778 ( 0.00%) 752329 ( 7.52%) 720041 ( 3.37%) 727850 ( 4.41%)
randwrite-512 666253 ( 0.00%) 722760 ( 7.82%) 667081 ( 0.12%) 691126 ( 3.60%)
randwrite-1024 651223 ( 0.00%) 697776 ( 6.67%) 663292 ( 1.82%) 659625 ( 1.27%)
randwrite-2048 655558 ( 0.00%) 691887 ( 5.25%) 665720 ( 1.53%) 664073 ( 1.28%)
randwrite-4096 635556 ( 0.00%) 662721 ( 4.10%) 643170 ( 1.18%) 642400 ( 1.07%)
randwrite-8192 467357 ( 0.00%) 491364 ( 4.89%) 476720 ( 1.96%) 469734 ( 0.51%)
randwrite-16384 413188 ( 0.00%) 427521 ( 3.35%) 417353 ( 1.00%) 417282 ( 0.98%)
randwrite-32768 404161 ( 0.00%) 411721 ( 1.84%) 404942 ( 0.19%) 407580 ( 0.84%)
randwrite-65536 379372 ( 0.00%) 397312 ( 4.52%) 386853 ( 1.93%) 381273 ( 0.50%)
randwrite-131072 21780 ( 0.00%) 16924 (-28.69%) 21177 (-2.85%) 19758 (-10.23%)
randwrite-262144 6249 ( 0.00%) 5548 (-12.64%) 6370 ( 1.90%) 6316 ( 1.06%)
randwrite-524288 2915 ( 0.00%) 2582 (-12.90%) 2871 (-1.53%) 2859 (-1.96%)
bkwdread-64 1141196 ( 0.00%) 1141196 ( 0.00%) 1004538 (-13.60%) 1141196 ( 0.00%)
bkwdread-128 1066865 ( 0.00%) 1386465 (23.05%) 1400936 (23.85%) 1101900 ( 3.18%)
bkwdread-256 877797 ( 0.00%) 1105556 (20.60%) 1105556 (20.60%) 1105556 (20.60%)
bkwdread-512 1133103 ( 0.00%) 1162547 ( 2.53%) 1175271 ( 3.59%) 1162547 ( 2.53%)
bkwdread-1024 1163562 ( 0.00%) 1206714 ( 3.58%) 1213534 ( 4.12%) 1195962 ( 2.71%)
bkwdread-2048 1163439 ( 0.00%) 1218910 ( 4.55%) 1204552 ( 3.41%) 1204552 ( 3.41%)
bkwdread-4096 1116792 ( 0.00%) 1175477 ( 4.99%) 1159922 ( 3.72%) 1150600 ( 2.94%)
bkwdread-8192 912288 ( 0.00%) 935233 ( 2.45%) 944695 ( 3.43%) 934724 ( 2.40%)
bkwdread-16384 817707 ( 0.00%) 824140 ( 0.78%) 832527 ( 1.78%) 829152 ( 1.38%)
bkwdread-32768 775898 ( 0.00%) 773714 (-0.28%) 785494 ( 1.22%) 787691 ( 1.50%)
bkwdread-65536 759643 ( 0.00%) 769924 ( 1.34%) 778780 ( 2.46%) 772174 ( 1.62%)
bkwdread-131072 763215 ( 0.00%) 769634 ( 0.83%) 773707 ( 1.36%) 773816 ( 1.37%)
bkwdread-262144 765491 ( 0.00%) 768992 ( 0.46%) 780876 ( 1.97%) 780021 ( 1.86%)
bkwdread-524288 3688 ( 0.00%) 3595 (-2.59%) 3577 (-3.10%) 3724 ( 0.97%)
The upcoming changes for 2.6.33 also help iozone in many cases, often by more
than just disabling low_latency. It has the occasional massive gain or loss
for the larger file sizes. I don't know why this is but as the big losses
appear to be mostly in the write-tests, I would guess that it's differences
in heavy-writer-throttling.
The only downside with block-2.6.33 is that there are a lot of patches in
there and doesn't help with the 2.6.32 release as such. I could do a reverse
bisect to see what helps the most in there but under ideal conditions, it'll
take 3 days to complete and I wouldn't be able to start until Monday as I'm
out of the country for the weekend. That's a bit late.
p.s. As a consequence of being out of the country, I also won't be able to
respond to mail over the weekend.
--
Mel Gorman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists