[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091127024054.GA5406@nowhere>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:40:56 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, msb@...gle.com
Subject: Re: PATCH: softlockup: Fix hung_task_check_count sysctl
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 01:28:20PM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>
> I'm seeing spikes of up to 0.5ms in khungtaskd on a large machine. To reduce
> this source of jitter I tried setting hung_task_check_count to 0:
>
> # echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_check_count
>
> which didn't have the intended response. Change to a post increment of
> max_count, so a value of 0 means check 0 tasks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> ---
>
> Index: linux.trees.git/kernel/hung_task.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.trees.git.orig/kernel/hung_task.c 2009-11-27 13:11:46.000000000 +1100
> +++ linux.trees.git/kernel/hung_task.c 2009-11-27 13:11:57.000000000 +1100
> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static void check_hung_uninterruptible_t
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> do_each_thread(g, t) {
> - if (!--max_count)
> + if (!max_count--)
> goto unlock;
> if (!--batch_count) {
> batch_count = HUNG_TASK_BATCHING;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists