[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1259437665.10954.775.camel@nimitz>
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:47:45 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
To: Thiago Farina <tfransosi@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rpurdie@...ys.net,
martinez.javier@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: fix the return value of ich7_lpc_probe.
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 10:48 -0500, Thiago Farina wrote:
> In the function ich7_lpc_probe there is a 'return' that is not returning any
> value, but it should because the return type is int not void.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thiago Farina <tfransosi@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/leds/leds-ss4200.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-ss4200.c b/drivers/leds/leds-ss4200.c
> index c7f6347..a0c4092 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-ss4200.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-ss4200.c
> @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ static int __devinit ich7_lpc_probe(struct pci_dev *dev,
> status = pci_enable_device(dev);
> if (status) {
> dev_err(&dev->dev, "pci_enable_device failed\n");
> - return;
> + return status;
> }
There's a patch in -mm to do something similar. It should be pushed
upstream when the next set of -mm patches goes.
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/drivers-leds-leds-ss4200c-fix-return-statement.patch
Thanks for posting this, though.
-- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists