[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200911281413.14142.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:13:13 -0800
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König"
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Nicolas Pitre <nico@...vell.com>,
Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] warn about shared irqs requesting IRQF_DISABLED registered with setup_irq
On Saturday 28 November 2009, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> What about analysing the code and verifying that the setup order is
> correct ?
Better to not care too much about setup order. Sometimes it's
unavoidable -- X initializes before Y "or else..." -- but the
patch I saw was just reporting goofage better.
> Adding save/restore_irq just because you have no clue what the code
> does is utter nonsense.
Absolutely. If that helps, find and fix the real bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists