[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1259422066.2155.4.camel@laptop>
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:27:46 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Michael Breuer <mbreuer@...jas.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problem? intel_iommu=off; perf top shows acpi_os_read_port as
extremely busy
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 08:18 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Michael Breuer <mbreuer@...jas.com> wrote:
>
> > Having given up for now on VT-D, I rebooted 2.6.38 rc8 with
> > intel_iommu=off. Whilst my myriad of broken bios issues cleared, I now
> > see in perf top acpi_os_read_port as continually the busiest function.
> > With intel_iommu enabled, _spin_lock was always on top, and nothing
> > else was notable.
> >
> > This seems odd to me, perhaps this will make sense to someone else.
> >
> > FWIW, I'm running on an Asus p6t deluxe v2; ht enabled; no errors or
> > oddities in dmesg or /var/log/messages.
>
> Could you post the perf top output please?
>
> Also, could you also post the output of:
>
> perf stat -a --repeat 10 sleep 1
>
> this will show us how idle the system is. (My guess is that your system
> is idle and perf top shows acpi_os_read_port because the system goes to
> idle via ACPI methods and PIO is slow. In that case all is nominal and
> your system is fine. But it's hard to tell without more details.)
Isn't there also a list of symbols it won't display? Can't find either
the list nor the switch to turn it off (really didn't look hard), but
acme might know.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists