[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8C8865ED624BB94F8FE50259E2B5C5B304593DABB2@palmail03.lsi.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:02:52 -0500
From: "Leyendecker, Robert" <Robert.Leyendecker@....com>
To: Tim Blechmann <tim@...ngt.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: ext4: smp_processor_id() in preemptible
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Blechmann [mailto:tim@...ngt.org]
> Sent: Friday, November 27, 2009 4:33 AM
> To: Leyendecker, Robert
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: ext4: smp_processor_id() in preemptible
>
> > I have similar crash, but probably different cause-vector, posted on
> this list, fedora bugzilla, rt-users but no response so far from
> anyone. Did you find any work around? I tried looking at smp code for
> hints on problem it looks like in my case it could be trying to
> reschedule work on different CPU at time of crash. However, I admit
> that I could be way, way off on that cause. In my case, if I hammer my
> network interface with packets while another app is reading packets, my
> host locks up and clients are reporting dest unreachables.
> >
> > I don't think I have the problem in non-rt kernel. Have you tried
> booting without smp support?
>
> i haven't tried to reproduce it since then ... it occurred, when i was
> doing some heavy io tasks ...
>
> tim
>
> --
> tim@...ngt.org
> http://tim.klingt.org
>
> Nothing exists until or unless it is observed. An artist is making
> something exist by observing it. And his hope for other people is that
> they will also make it exist by observing it. I call it 'creative
> observation.' Creative viewing.
> William S. Burroughs
OK - thanks. I'm arriving here via heavy network io, relatively easy to repro in my case.
-Bob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists