lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:13:16 +0000 From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> To: Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org> Cc: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>, Andy Walls <awalls@...ix.net>, Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@...il.com>, Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>, Christoph Bartelmus <lirc@...telmus.de>, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, j@...nau.net, jarod@...hat.com, jarod@...sonet.com, linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org, mchehab@...hat.com, stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de, superm1@...ntu.com Subject: Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system? > If decoding can *only* be sanely handled in user-space, that's one > thing. If it can be handled in kernel, then that would be better. Why ? I can compute fast fourier transforms in the kernel but that doesn't make it better than doing it in user space. I can write web servers in the kernel and the same applies. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists