[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B123A82.10104@panasas.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:10:26 +0200
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the osd tree with the scsi tree
On 11/27/2009 05:32 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Boaz,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the osd tree got a conflict in
> drivers/scsi/osd/osd_uld.c between commit
> f89b9ee4a722721ed205b8c29555ac75fbe8c2cc ("[SCSI] osduld: Use
> device->release instead of internal kref") from the scsi tree and commit
> 9b579fe8588b861dcf0c9b620757729643db4557 ("osduld: Use device->release
> instead of internal kref") from the osd tree.
>
> These are slightly different versions of the same patch ...
>
> And commit 01e4c32c668251e74eb179ee1207c075466c4ef8 ("osduld: No need to
> use dev_set_drvdata on embedded devices") from the osd also contributes
> to the conflict.
>
James has squashed these two patches together. Which do belong together
I should say. In my tree they are separate. I will change my tree to
match James's.
Thanks James, I prefer it much better this way.
> I fixed it up (the obvious way) and can carry the fix for a while.
Thanks
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists