[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B1283C9.1030002@panasas.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:23:05 +0200
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
CC: open-osd <osd-dev@...n-osd.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the osd tree with the scsi tree
On 11/29/2009 03:46 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
>>
>> Should I repost the correct two patches (my preference)? should I send in a fix to
>> current scsi-misc tree? or should I send two SQUASH-ME patches to the two bad commits
>> in your tree?
>>
>> How do you want to proceed?
>
> Send me the replacement patch (and tell me which commit id in my tree
> it's replacing).
>
Thank you James.
I'm posting two patches as reply to this mail.
[PATCH 1/2] osduld: Use device->release instead of internal kref
which replaces:
f89b9ee [SCSI] osduld: Use device->release instead of internal kref
and
[PATCH 2/2] libosd: osd_dev_info: Unique Identification of an OSD device
which replaces:
3b616d4 [SCSI] libosd: osd_dev_info: Unique Identification of an OSD device
> Thanks,
>
> James
>
>
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists