lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:35:54 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>,
	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 3/12] PCI / PM: Propagate wake-up enable for PCIe devices too

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>

Having read the PM part of the PCIe 2.0 specification more carefully
I think that it was a mistake to restrict the wake-up enable
propagation to non-PCIe devices, because if we do not request
control of the root ports' PME registers via OSC, PCIe PME is
supposed to be handled by the platform, just like the non-PCIe PME.
Even if we do that, the wake-up propagation is done to allow the
devices to wake up the system from sleep states which involves the
platform anyway, so it won't hurt.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
---
 drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c |   10 ++--------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
@@ -112,11 +112,7 @@ static bool acpi_pci_can_wakeup(struct p
 static void acpi_pci_propagate_wakeup_enable(struct pci_bus *bus, bool enable)
 {
 	while (bus->parent) {
-		struct pci_dev *bridge = bus->self;
-		int ret;
-
-		ret = acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake(&bridge->dev, enable);
-		if (!ret || bridge->is_pcie)
+		if (!acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake(&bus->self->dev, enable))
 			return;
 		bus = bus->parent;
 	}
@@ -131,9 +127,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_sleep_wake(struct pc
 	if (acpi_pci_can_wakeup(dev))
 		return acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake(&dev->dev, enable);
 
-	if (!dev->is_pcie)
-		acpi_pci_propagate_wakeup_enable(dev->bus, enable);
-
+	acpi_pci_propagate_wakeup_enable(dev->bus, enable);
 	return 0;
 }
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ