[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091130092849.GA6896@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:28:49 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
Cc: David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...vell.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] warn about shared irqs requesting IRQF_DISABLED
registered with setup_irq
Hello Jamie,
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 03:18:40PM +0000, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> According to this thread, at the moment when you have multiple
> IRQF_DISABLED|IRQF_SHARED ISRs, only the first one is run with
> interrupts disabled.
No. When you have multiple IRQF_SHARED ISRs *all* are run with irqs
disabled if the first has IRQF_DISABLED.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists