lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200911300233.nAU2X5jp007432@agora.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu>
Date:	Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:33:05 -0500
From:	Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu>
To:	Valerie Aurora <vaurora@...hat.com>
Cc:	Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
	Scott James Remnant <scott@...onical.com>,
	Sandu Popa Marius <sandupopamarius@...il.com>,
	Jan Rekorajski <baggins@...h.mimuw.edu.pl>,
	"J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05@...oo.co.jp>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Vladimir Dronnikov <dronnikov@...il.com>,
	Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/41] VFS: Add read-only users count to superblock 

In message <1256152779-10054-8-git-send-email-vaurora@...hat.com>, Valerie Aurora writes:
> While we can check if a file system is currently read-only, we can't
> guarantee that it will stay read-only.  The file system can be
> remounted read-write at any time; it's also conceivable that a file
> system can be mounted a second time and converted to read-write if the
> underlying fs allows it.  This is a problem for union mounts, which
> require the underlying file system be read-only.  Add a read-only
> users count and don't allow remounts to change the file system to
> read-write or read-write mounts if there are any read-only users.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Valerie Aurora <vaurora@...hat.com>
> ---
>  fs/super.c         |   14 ++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/fs.h |    5 +++++
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
> index 2761d3e..c8140ac 100644
> --- a/fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/super.c
> @@ -553,6 +553,15 @@ int do_remount_sb(struct super_block *sb, int flags, void *data, int force)
>  	}
>  	remount_rw = !(flags & MS_RDONLY) && (sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY);
>  
> +	/* If we are remounting read/write, make sure that none of the
> +	   users require read-only for correct operation (such as
> +	   union mounts). */

Minor nit: but I think multi-line comments look better like this:

      /*
       * text
       */

> +	if (remount_rw && sb->s_readonly_users) {
> +		printk(KERN_INFO "%s: In use by %d read-only user(s)\n",
> +		       sb->s_id, sb->s_readonly_users);
> +		return -EROFS;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (sb->s_op->remount_fs) {
>  		retval = sb->s_op->remount_fs(sb, &flags, data);
>  		if (retval)
> @@ -889,6 +898,11 @@ vfs_kern_mount(struct file_system_type *type, int flags, const char *name, void
>   	if (error)
>   		goto out_sb;
>  
> +	error = -EROFS;
> +	if (!(flags & MS_RDONLY) &&
> +	    (mnt->mnt_sb->s_readonly_users))

Minor nit: two parts of '&&' in the above 'if' can go on same line and not
violate checkpatch.

> +		goto out_sb;
> +
>  	mnt->mnt_mountpoint = mnt->mnt_root;
>  	mnt->mnt_parent = mnt;
>  	up_write(&mnt->mnt_sb->s_umount);
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index 73e9b64..5fb7343 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -1379,6 +1379,11 @@ struct super_block {
>  	 * generic_show_options()
>  	 */
>  	char *s_options;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Users who require read-only access - e.g., union mounts
> +	 */

Minor nit: for short one-line comments I prefer to save LoC:

      /* text */

> +	int s_readonly_users;
>  };
>  
>  extern struct timespec current_fs_time(struct super_block *sb);
> -- 
> 1.6.3.3
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Erez.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ