[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091130081147.274c8af0@jbarnes-piketon>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:11:47 -0800
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@...hat.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>,
Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>, kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] change PCI nomenclature according to PCI-SIG
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 07:54:03 -0500
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
> Next, IMO, you don't have any idea how maintainers will react to this
> patch, because you CC'd so few of them. People who perform tree-wide
> changes should take the time to CC __every__ relevant maintainer. If
> you are changing somebody's code, you should always let them know
> about it, and give them an opportunity to review the change.
> scripts/get_maintainer.pl can help with this.
>
> So, while the PCI maintainer might agree with the nomenclature
> change, he is not the most qualified person to state that your
> changes have no effect on drivers/edac/ppc4xx_edac.c, for example.
Honestly I'm not thrilled about it either. Given the large
downside of making many oustanding diffs conflict, I'm wary of these
sorts of changes in general. I suggested to Stefan that he just put
together one big patch to minimize that pain, but I didn't expect
something so huge (I was thinking it would be mainly limited to PCI
related files).
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists