[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091130190030.GA5560@shareable.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:00:30 +0000
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
To: Duane Griffin <duaneg@...da.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] vfs: plug some holes involving LAST_BIND symlinks and file bind mounts (try #5)
Duane Griffin wrote:
> 2009/11/24 Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>:
> > On Tue 2009-11-24 12:53:09, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> >> I still believe leaving the current semantics and documenting them is
> >> the best option.
> >
> > I believe that current semantics is ugly enough that 'documenting' it
> > is not enough... and people want to port from other systems, too, not
> > expecting nasty surprises like this...
>
> Solaris 10 works the same way as Linux does now, so I don't think the
> porting argument gets you anywhere.
It certainly must be similar, as gnulib uses the same technique on
both Solaris and Linux.
I don't have a Solaris to try this on. Can you use /proc to re-open
with O_RDWR a file descriptor previously opened with O_RDONLY on
Solaris 10, assuming the underlying inode allows writing?
-- Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists