linux-kernel - Re: powerpc: syscall_dotrace() && retcode (Was: powerpc: fork && stepping)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091130200136.GB11764@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:01:36 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, utrace-devel@...hat.com,
	Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: powerpc: syscall_dotrace() && retcode (Was: powerpc: fork &&
	stepping)

On 11/30, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 22:07 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > If I change the test-case to use NEWVAL == 1000 (or any other value
> > greater than NR_syscalls), then the tracee sees ENOSYS and this is
> > correct too.
> >
> > But I do not see how it is possible to change the retcode on powerpc.
> > Unlike x86, powepc doesn't set -ENOSYS "in advance", before doing
> > do_syscall_trace_enter() logic. This means that if the tracer "cancels"
> > syscall, r3 will be overwritten by syscall_enosys.
> >
> > This probably means the kernel should be fixed too, but I am not
> > brave enough to change the asm which I can't understand ;)
>
> Yes, the asm should be changed. I suppose we could check if the result
> of do_syscall_trace_enter is negative, and if it is, branch to the exit
> path using r3 as the error code. Would that be ok ?
>
> Something like this:
>
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
> @@ -240,6 +240,9 @@ syscall_dotrace:
>  	bl	.save_nvgprs
>  	addi	r3,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
>  	bl	.do_syscall_trace_enter
> +	cmpdi	cr0,r3,0
> +	blt	syscall_exit
> +

Yes, but this doesn't allow to a) cancel this syscall and b) make it
return a non-negative result to the tracee.

Perhaps poweprc should set pt_regs->result = -ENOSYS before calling
do_syscall_trace_enter() like x86 does ? (in this case syscall_exit()
shouldn't change RESULT(r1)). This way the tracer can change both
pt_regs->result and gpr[0] independently.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/