linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tracing: add DEFINE_EVENT(), DEFINE_SINGLE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:01:59 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	randy.dunlap@...cle.com, mhiramat@...hat.com, wcohen@...hat.com,
	fweisbec@...il.com, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: add DEFINE_EVENT(), DEFINE_SINGLE_EVENT()
 support to docbook

On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 16:23 -0500, Jason Baron wrote:
> The introduction of the new 'DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS()' obviates the need for the
> 'TRACE_EVENT()' macro in some cases. Thus, docbook style comments that used
> to live with 'TRACE_EVENT()' are now moved to 'DEFINE_EVENT()'. Thus, we need
> to make the docbook system understand the new 'DEFINE_EVENT()' macro. In
> addition I've tried to futureproof the patch, by also adding support for
> 'DEFINE_SINGLE_EVENT()', since there has been discussion about renaming:
> TRACE_EVENT() -> DEFINE_SINGLE_EVENT().
> 
> Without this patch the tracepoint docbook fails to build.
> 
> I've verified that this patch correctly builds the tracepoint docbook which
> currently covers signals, and irqs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>

Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/