[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1259625025.2701.33.camel@cail>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:50:25 -0500
From: "Alan D. Brunelle" <Alan.Brunelle@...com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jens.axboe@...cle.com, nauman@...gle.com, dpshah@...gle.com,
lizf@...fujitsu.com, ryov@...inux.co.jp, fernando@....ntt.co.jp,
s-uchida@...jp.nec.com, taka@...inux.co.jp,
guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com, jmoyer@...hat.com,
righi.andrea@...il.com, m-ikeda@...jp.nec.com
Subject: Re: Block IO Controller V4
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 17:56 -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 05:00:33PM -0500, Alan D. Brunelle wrote:
> > FYI: Results today from my test suite - haven't had time to parse them
> > in any depth...
>
> Thanks Alan. I am trying to parse the results below. s0 and s8 still mean
> slice idle enabled disabled? Instead of that we can try group_isolation
> enabled or disabled for all the tests.
I'm concerned as well - I think I did the base run /after/ the i1,s0
run. I'll need to check that out tomorrow...
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists