[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <AFCCABA5-177F-4FA5-827E-BFF216510943@wilsonet.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:50:45 -0500
From: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...sonet.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>, Andy Walls <awalls@...ix.net>,
Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@...il.com>,
Christoph Bartelmus <lirc@...telmus.de>,
"j@...nau.net" <j@...nau.net>,
"jarod@...hat.com" <jarod@...hat.com>,
"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"maximlevitsky@...il.com" <maximlevitsky@...il.com>,
"mchehab@...hat.com" <mchehab@...hat.com>,
"stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de" <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
"superm1@...ntu.com" <superm1@...ntu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?
On Nov 29, 2009, at 4:31 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2009, at 12:27 PM, Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl> wrote:
>
>> 1. Do we agree that a lirc (-style) kernel-user interface is needed at
>> least?
>>
>> 2. Is there any problem with lirc kernel-user interface?
>>
>> If the answer for #1 is "yes" and for #2 is "no" then perhaps we merge
>> the Jarod's lirc patches (at least the core) so at least the
>> non-controversial part is done?
>
>
> Isn't the meat of Jarod's patch the lirc interface?
Patch 1 was the lirc interface, 2 and 3 are individual device drivers that use it.
/me has some catching up to do on this thread after being partially detached from the computer over the holiday weekend here in the US...
--
Jarod Wilson
jarod@...sonet.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists