[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1f1b08da0911301612x619034ahfe4279e4ae8a9c3f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:12:07 -0800
From: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
To: Matthias Urlichs <matthias@...ichs.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Time nonlinearity (gettimeofday vs. mtime)
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Matthias Urlichs <matthias@...ichs.de> wrote:
> Lately I've seen this ugliness:
>
> 13:39:06.000313 clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME, {1259325546, 341196}) = 0 <0.000010>
> 13:39:06.000685 mkdir("/var/tmp/CP_FileTest_TempFolder_d0AOiP/tempFolder1", 0777) = 0 <0.000043>
> 13:39:06.000973 stat64("/var/tmp/CP_FileTest_TempFolder_d0AOiP/tempFolder1", {st_dev=makedev(252, 2), st_ino=1919104, st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_nlink=2, st_uid=501, st_gid=501, st_blksize=4096, st_blocks=8, st_size=4096, st_atime=2009/11/27-13:39:05, st_mtime=2009/11/27-13:39:05, st_ctime=2009/11/27-13:39:05}) = 0 <0.000015>
>
> This strace says that st.st_mtime is smaller than time.tv_sec even though the time was acquired earlier.
> Apparently, the problem is that ext3 uses a cached time value for performance.
>
> Question: Is there a reason that the cached time is not updated every time somebody calls gettimeofday() or clock_gettime()?
> Or did just that nobody notice this problem yet?
This behavior is expected. For performance reasons (some clocksources
take 1.3us per read), most filesystem code uses current_kernel_time()
which provides the time at the last timer tick.
If you check mainline, there's a new CLOCK_REALTIME_COARSE clockid,
that provides the same behavior as the filesystem timestamps.
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists